"Q. In a match between A and B, B made a statement which A interpreted to
mean that his (A’s) next stroke was conceded. Accordingly, A lifted his ball. B
then said that he had not conceded A’s next stroke. What is the ruling?
A. If B’s statement could reasonably have led A to think his next stroke
had been conceded, in equity (Rule 1-4), A should replace his ball as near as
possible to where it lay, without penalty.
Otherwise, A would incur a penalty stroke for lifting his ball without
marking its position – Rule 20-1 – and he must replace his ball as near as
possible to where it lay."
We just sent you an email. Please click the link in the email to confirm your subscription!